Seznamy 62+ Clang __Atomic_Is_Lock_Free Vynikající
Seznamy 62+ Clang __Atomic_Is_Lock_Free Vynikající. 19.04.2017 · the goal is to allow libc++ to implement`atomic__lock_free` on windows using clang. As you know libc++ currently uses the __gcc_atomic_foo macros, but those aren't available on windows.
Prezentováno Gem5 Splash3 0 On Arm64
Also afaik msvc leaves the implementation of atomics up to the library, not the frontend. Devsnek closed this in ab3174c on jun 21, 2019. Targos added a commit that referenced this issue on …Symbol(s) not found for architecture x86_64 clang:
Which, combined with the builtin returning int, results in a call having the wrong type. #define atomic_is_lock_free (obj) __c11_atomic_is_lock_free (sizeof (* (obj))). Also afaik msvc leaves the implementation of atomics up to the library, not the frontend. 15.05.2017 · no, i'm not able help debug or i don't have time to help. Undefined symbols for architecture x86_64: The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:

Targos added a commit that referenced this issue on …. Also afaik msvc leaves the implementation of atomics up to the library, not the frontend. #define atomic_is_lock_free (obj) __c11_atomic_is_lock_free (sizeof (* (obj))). 19.04.2017 · the goal is to allow libc++ to implement`atomic__lock_free` on windows using clang. Junaruga changed the title rake failed with undefined reference to `__atomic_is_lock_free' install failed with undefined reference to … Targos added a commit that referenced this issue on … Which, combined with the builtin returning int, results in a call having the wrong type. 26.07.2017 · well clang gives error: The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: Devsnek closed this in ab3174c on jun 21, 2019. So w/e msvc's stl does it's likely not sane or desirable.

The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: 19.04.2017 · the goal is to allow libc++ to implement`atomic__lock_free` on windows using clang.. #define atomic_is_lock_free (obj) __c11_atomic_is_lock_free (sizeof (* (obj))).

So w/e msvc's stl does it's likely not sane or desirable. Devsnek changed the title __atomic_is_lock_free undefined __atomic_is_lock_free undefined on clang on jun 18, 2019. 26.07.2017 · well clang gives error: The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: Symbol(s) not found for architecture x86_64 clang:.. So w/e msvc's stl does it's likely not sane or desirable.

19.04.2017 · the goal is to allow libc++ to implement`atomic__lock_free` on windows using clang... Junaruga changed the title rake failed with undefined reference to `__atomic_is_lock_free' install failed with undefined reference to … 19.04.2017 · the goal is to allow libc++ to implement`atomic__lock_free` on windows using clang. Targos added a commit that referenced this issue on … Devsnek closed this in ab3174c on jun 21, 2019. So w/e msvc's stl does it's likely not sane or desirable. If only aligned memory accesses are naturally atomic on a given architecture, misaligned objects of the same type have to use locks. Symbol(s) not found for architecture x86_64 clang: 26.07.2017 · well clang gives error:. Targos added a commit that referenced this issue on …

Junaruga changed the title rake failed with undefined reference to `__atomic_is_lock_free' install failed with undefined reference to ….. 15.05.2017 · no, i'm not able help debug or i don't have time to help. Undefined symbols for architecture x86_64: Junaruga changed the title rake failed with undefined reference to `__atomic_is_lock_free' install failed with undefined reference to … Also afaik msvc leaves the implementation of atomics up to the library, not the frontend. 19.04.2017 · the goal is to allow libc++ to implement`atomic__lock_free` on windows using clang.

As you know libc++ currently uses the __gcc_atomic_foo macros, but those aren't available on windows... 15.05.2017 · no, i'm not able help debug or i don't have time to help... Also afaik msvc leaves the implementation of atomics up to the library, not the frontend.
#define atomic_is_lock_free (obj) __c11_atomic_is_lock_free (sizeof (* (obj))). 15.05.2017 · no, i'm not able help debug or i don't have time to help.
If only aligned memory accesses are naturally atomic on a given architecture, misaligned objects of the same type have to use locks.. As you know libc++ currently uses the __gcc_atomic_foo macros, but those aren't available on windows. 15.05.2017 · no, i'm not able help debug or i don't have time to help. So w/e msvc's stl does it's likely not sane or desirable. The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: 19.04.2017 · the goal is to allow libc++ to implement`atomic__lock_free` on windows using clang. Targos added a commit that referenced this issue on ….. 26.07.2017 · well clang gives error:

Also afaik msvc leaves the implementation of atomics up to the library, not the frontend. 19.04.2017 · the goal is to allow libc++ to implement`atomic__lock_free` on windows using clang. 15.05.2017 · no, i'm not able help debug or i don't have time to help.
26.07.2017 · well clang gives error: 19.04.2017 · the goal is to allow libc++ to implement`atomic__lock_free` on windows using clang. Devsnek closed this in ab3174c on jun 21, 2019... Junaruga changed the title rake failed with undefined reference to `__atomic_is_lock_free' install failed with undefined reference to …

26.07.2017 · well clang gives error: Also afaik msvc leaves the implementation of atomics up to the library, not the frontend. 19.04.2017 · the goal is to allow libc++ to implement`atomic__lock_free` on windows using clang. Undefined symbols for architecture x86_64: Devsnek changed the title __atomic_is_lock_free undefined __atomic_is_lock_free undefined on clang on jun 18, 2019.

19.04.2017 · the goal is to allow libc++ to implement`atomic__lock_free` on windows using clang. 15.05.2017 · no, i'm not able help debug or i don't have time to help. Devsnek closed this in ab3174c on jun 21, 2019. Which, combined with the builtin returning int, results in a call having the wrong type. As you know libc++ currently uses the __gcc_atomic_foo macros, but those aren't available on windows. Symbol(s) not found for architecture x86_64 clang: The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: So w/e msvc's stl does it's likely not sane or desirable. Devsnek changed the title __atomic_is_lock_free undefined __atomic_is_lock_free undefined on clang on jun 18, 2019. #define atomic_is_lock_free (obj) __c11_atomic_is_lock_free (sizeof (* (obj))). Junaruga changed the title rake failed with undefined reference to `__atomic_is_lock_free' install failed with undefined reference to …. If only aligned memory accesses are naturally atomic on a given architecture, misaligned objects of the same type have to use locks.
Also afaik msvc leaves the implementation of atomics up to the library, not the frontend... 19.04.2017 · the goal is to allow libc++ to implement`atomic__lock_free` on windows using clang. Undefined symbols for architecture x86_64: So w/e msvc's stl does it's likely not sane or desirable. Devsnek changed the title __atomic_is_lock_free undefined __atomic_is_lock_free undefined on clang on jun 18, 2019. As you know libc++ currently uses the __gcc_atomic_foo macros, but those aren't available on windows. Devsnek closed this in ab3174c on jun 21, 2019. If only aligned memory accesses are naturally atomic on a given architecture, misaligned objects of the same type have to use locks. 26.07.2017 · well clang gives error:.. Undefined symbols for architecture x86_64:
Devsnek changed the title __atomic_is_lock_free undefined __atomic_is_lock_free undefined on clang on jun 18, 2019.. #define atomic_is_lock_free (obj) __c11_atomic_is_lock_free (sizeof (* (obj))).

Symbol(s) not found for architecture x86_64 clang:.. Devsnek closed this in ab3174c on jun 21, 2019. Devsnek changed the title __atomic_is_lock_free undefined __atomic_is_lock_free undefined on clang on jun 18, 2019. 15.05.2017 · no, i'm not able help debug or i don't have time to help. If only aligned memory accesses are naturally atomic on a given architecture, misaligned objects of the same type have to use locks. The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:. 26.07.2017 · well clang gives error:
15.05.2017 · no, i'm not able help debug or i don't have time to help. Symbol(s) not found for architecture x86_64 clang: If only aligned memory accesses are naturally atomic on a given architecture, misaligned objects of the same type have to use locks. Undefined symbols for architecture x86_64: 15.05.2017 · no, i'm not able help debug or i don't have time to help. So w/e msvc's stl does it's likely not sane or desirable. 19.04.2017 · the goal is to allow libc++ to implement`atomic__lock_free` on windows using clang. Also afaik msvc leaves the implementation of atomics up to the library, not the frontend.. 15.05.2017 · no, i'm not able help debug or i don't have time to help.
Undefined symbols for architecture x86_64: 26.07.2017 · well clang gives error: Devsnek closed this in ab3174c on jun 21, 2019. Devsnek changed the title __atomic_is_lock_free undefined __atomic_is_lock_free undefined on clang on jun 18, 2019. Symbol(s) not found for architecture x86_64 clang: Targos added a commit that referenced this issue on … If only aligned memory accesses are naturally atomic on a given architecture, misaligned objects of the same type have to use locks.. Devsnek changed the title __atomic_is_lock_free undefined __atomic_is_lock_free undefined on clang on jun 18, 2019.
19.04.2017 · the goal is to allow libc++ to implement`atomic__lock_free` on windows using clang. 15.05.2017 · no, i'm not able help debug or i don't have time to help. Which, combined with the builtin returning int, results in a call having the wrong type.

19.04.2017 · the goal is to allow libc++ to implement`atomic__lock_free` on windows using clang.. 26.07.2017 · well clang gives error: The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: Which, combined with the builtin returning int, results in a call having the wrong type. #define atomic_is_lock_free (obj) __c11_atomic_is_lock_free (sizeof (* (obj))). Devsnek changed the title __atomic_is_lock_free undefined __atomic_is_lock_free undefined on clang on jun 18, 2019. As you know libc++ currently uses the __gcc_atomic_foo macros, but those aren't available on windows. Junaruga changed the title rake failed with undefined reference to `__atomic_is_lock_free' install failed with undefined reference to … 19.04.2017 · the goal is to allow libc++ to implement`atomic__lock_free` on windows using clang... Which, combined with the builtin returning int, results in a call having the wrong type.
Which, combined with the builtin returning int, results in a call having the wrong type... As you know libc++ currently uses the __gcc_atomic_foo macros, but those aren't available on windows. Devsnek changed the title __atomic_is_lock_free undefined __atomic_is_lock_free undefined on clang on jun 18, 2019. Junaruga changed the title rake failed with undefined reference to `__atomic_is_lock_free' install failed with undefined reference to … Symbol(s) not found for architecture x86_64 clang: #define atomic_is_lock_free (obj) __c11_atomic_is_lock_free (sizeof (* (obj))). 26.07.2017 · well clang gives error: If only aligned memory accesses are naturally atomic on a given architecture, misaligned objects of the same type have to use locks.. Also afaik msvc leaves the implementation of atomics up to the library, not the frontend.
Also afaik msvc leaves the implementation of atomics up to the library, not the frontend. 19.04.2017 · the goal is to allow libc++ to implement`atomic__lock_free` on windows using clang. Symbol(s) not found for architecture x86_64 clang: As you know libc++ currently uses the __gcc_atomic_foo macros, but those aren't available on windows. Junaruga changed the title rake failed with undefined reference to `__atomic_is_lock_free' install failed with undefined reference to … Undefined symbols for architecture x86_64: Devsnek closed this in ab3174c on jun 21, 2019. Which, combined with the builtin returning int, results in a call having the wrong type... If only aligned memory accesses are naturally atomic on a given architecture, misaligned objects of the same type have to use locks.

Targos added a commit that referenced this issue on …. Devsnek changed the title __atomic_is_lock_free undefined __atomic_is_lock_free undefined on clang on jun 18, 2019. #define atomic_is_lock_free (obj) __c11_atomic_is_lock_free (sizeof (* (obj))). As you know libc++ currently uses the __gcc_atomic_foo macros, but those aren't available on windows. Also afaik msvc leaves the implementation of atomics up to the library, not the frontend. Symbol(s) not found for architecture x86_64 clang: 15.05.2017 · no, i'm not able help debug or i don't have time to help.

Symbol(s) not found for architecture x86_64 clang:.. If only aligned memory accesses are naturally atomic on a given architecture, misaligned objects of the same type have to use locks. So w/e msvc's stl does it's likely not sane or desirable. Junaruga changed the title rake failed with undefined reference to `__atomic_is_lock_free' install failed with undefined reference to … 19.04.2017 · the goal is to allow libc++ to implement`atomic__lock_free` on windows using clang.. 26.07.2017 · well clang gives error:
As you know libc++ currently uses the __gcc_atomic_foo macros, but those aren't available on windows.. Junaruga changed the title rake failed with undefined reference to `__atomic_is_lock_free' install failed with undefined reference to … Devsnek closed this in ab3174c on jun 21, 2019.. Symbol(s) not found for architecture x86_64 clang:

15.05.2017 · no, i'm not able help debug or i don't have time to help. Symbol(s) not found for architecture x86_64 clang: 19.04.2017 · the goal is to allow libc++ to implement`atomic__lock_free` on windows using clang. Devsnek changed the title __atomic_is_lock_free undefined __atomic_is_lock_free undefined on clang on jun 18, 2019. 15.05.2017 · no, i'm not able help debug or i don't have time to help. Undefined symbols for architecture x86_64: #define atomic_is_lock_free (obj) __c11_atomic_is_lock_free (sizeof (* (obj))). Devsnek closed this in ab3174c on jun 21, 2019. Also afaik msvc leaves the implementation of atomics up to the library, not the frontend. Targos added a commit that referenced this issue on …. Targos added a commit that referenced this issue on …

Symbol(s) not found for architecture x86_64 clang:.. Also afaik msvc leaves the implementation of atomics up to the library, not the frontend. 26.07.2017 · well clang gives error: #define atomic_is_lock_free (obj) __c11_atomic_is_lock_free (sizeof (* (obj))). The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: Undefined symbols for architecture x86_64:.. So w/e msvc's stl does it's likely not sane or desirable.
Junaruga changed the title rake failed with undefined reference to `__atomic_is_lock_free' install failed with undefined reference to … #define atomic_is_lock_free (obj) __c11_atomic_is_lock_free (sizeof (* (obj))). 15.05.2017 · no, i'm not able help debug or i don't have time to help. So w/e msvc's stl does it's likely not sane or desirable. 26.07.2017 · well clang gives error: The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: Devsnek changed the title __atomic_is_lock_free undefined __atomic_is_lock_free undefined on clang on jun 18, 2019. 19.04.2017 · the goal is to allow libc++ to implement`atomic__lock_free` on windows using clang. Undefined symbols for architecture x86_64: As you know libc++ currently uses the __gcc_atomic_foo macros, but those aren't available on windows. Also afaik msvc leaves the implementation of atomics up to the library, not the frontend. #define atomic_is_lock_free (obj) __c11_atomic_is_lock_free (sizeof (* (obj))).

#define atomic_is_lock_free (obj) __c11_atomic_is_lock_free (sizeof (* (obj))). Undefined symbols for architecture x86_64: If only aligned memory accesses are naturally atomic on a given architecture, misaligned objects of the same type have to use locks. 26.07.2017 · well clang gives error:. 15.05.2017 · no, i'm not able help debug or i don't have time to help.

Targos added a commit that referenced this issue on …. Also afaik msvc leaves the implementation of atomics up to the library, not the frontend. Targos added a commit that referenced this issue on …. The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:

Devsnek closed this in ab3174c on jun 21, 2019.. Devsnek changed the title __atomic_is_lock_free undefined __atomic_is_lock_free undefined on clang on jun 18, 2019. If only aligned memory accesses are naturally atomic on a given architecture, misaligned objects of the same type have to use locks.

15.05.2017 · no, i'm not able help debug or i don't have time to help.. Symbol(s) not found for architecture x86_64 clang: Undefined symbols for architecture x86_64: If only aligned memory accesses are naturally atomic on a given architecture, misaligned objects of the same type have to use locks. 15.05.2017 · no, i'm not able help debug or i don't have time to help.

Devsnek changed the title __atomic_is_lock_free undefined __atomic_is_lock_free undefined on clang on jun 18, 2019. Undefined symbols for architecture x86_64: Also afaik msvc leaves the implementation of atomics up to the library, not the frontend. #define atomic_is_lock_free (obj) __c11_atomic_is_lock_free (sizeof (* (obj))). 19.04.2017 · the goal is to allow libc++ to implement`atomic__lock_free` on windows using clang. 15.05.2017 · no, i'm not able help debug or i don't have time to help. Devsnek closed this in ab3174c on jun 21, 2019. Devsnek closed this in ab3174c on jun 21, 2019.
Junaruga changed the title rake failed with undefined reference to `__atomic_is_lock_free' install failed with undefined reference to ….. The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: Symbol(s) not found for architecture x86_64 clang: Undefined symbols for architecture x86_64: Targos added a commit that referenced this issue on … 26.07.2017 · well clang gives error: Devsnek changed the title __atomic_is_lock_free undefined __atomic_is_lock_free undefined on clang on jun 18, 2019. Devsnek changed the title __atomic_is_lock_free undefined __atomic_is_lock_free undefined on clang on jun 18, 2019.

Targos added a commit that referenced this issue on … 26.07.2017 · well clang gives error: Undefined symbols for architecture x86_64: So w/e msvc's stl does it's likely not sane or desirable. The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:

Devsnek closed this in ab3174c on jun 21, 2019. So w/e msvc's stl does it's likely not sane or desirable. Targos added a commit that referenced this issue on … As you know libc++ currently uses the __gcc_atomic_foo macros, but those aren't available on windows. Also afaik msvc leaves the implementation of atomics up to the library, not the frontend. 15.05.2017 · no, i'm not able help debug or i don't have time to help. #define atomic_is_lock_free (obj) __c11_atomic_is_lock_free (sizeof (* (obj))). Devsnek closed this in ab3174c on jun 21, 2019. The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:.. As you know libc++ currently uses the __gcc_atomic_foo macros, but those aren't available on windows.
26.07.2017 · well clang gives error: Devsnek changed the title __atomic_is_lock_free undefined __atomic_is_lock_free undefined on clang on jun 18, 2019.. 19.04.2017 · the goal is to allow libc++ to implement`atomic__lock_free` on windows using clang.

#define atomic_is_lock_free (obj) __c11_atomic_is_lock_free (sizeof (* (obj))).. If only aligned memory accesses are naturally atomic on a given architecture, misaligned objects of the same type have to use locks. Devsnek closed this in ab3174c on jun 21, 2019. Junaruga changed the title rake failed with undefined reference to `__atomic_is_lock_free' install failed with undefined reference to … #define atomic_is_lock_free (obj) __c11_atomic_is_lock_free (sizeof (* (obj))). 19.04.2017 · the goal is to allow libc++ to implement`atomic__lock_free` on windows using clang. So w/e msvc's stl does it's likely not sane or desirable. Undefined symbols for architecture x86_64: The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: 15.05.2017 · no, i'm not able help debug or i don't have time to help. As you know libc++ currently uses the __gcc_atomic_foo macros, but those aren't available on windows.

19.04.2017 · the goal is to allow libc++ to implement`atomic__lock_free` on windows using clang. #define atomic_is_lock_free (obj) __c11_atomic_is_lock_free (sizeof (* (obj))). Which, combined with the builtin returning int, results in a call having the wrong type. Devsnek closed this in ab3174c on jun 21, 2019. 26.07.2017 · well clang gives error: Targos added a commit that referenced this issue on … 19.04.2017 · the goal is to allow libc++ to implement`atomic__lock_free` on windows using clang. As you know libc++ currently uses the __gcc_atomic_foo macros, but those aren't available on windows. So w/e msvc's stl does it's likely not sane or desirable. The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:. Junaruga changed the title rake failed with undefined reference to `__atomic_is_lock_free' install failed with undefined reference to …
As you know libc++ currently uses the __gcc_atomic_foo macros, but those aren't available on windows. As you know libc++ currently uses the __gcc_atomic_foo macros, but those aren't available on windows. Symbol(s) not found for architecture x86_64 clang: Devsnek closed this in ab3174c on jun 21, 2019. Junaruga changed the title rake failed with undefined reference to `__atomic_is_lock_free' install failed with undefined reference to … If only aligned memory accesses are naturally atomic on a given architecture, misaligned objects of the same type have to use locks. Which, combined with the builtin returning int, results in a call having the wrong type. 19.04.2017 · the goal is to allow libc++ to implement`atomic__lock_free` on windows using clang. Devsnek changed the title __atomic_is_lock_free undefined __atomic_is_lock_free undefined on clang on jun 18, 2019.

The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:.. Symbol(s) not found for architecture x86_64 clang: Also afaik msvc leaves the implementation of atomics up to the library, not the frontend. Devsnek closed this in ab3174c on jun 21, 2019. Targos added a commit that referenced this issue on … So w/e msvc's stl does it's likely not sane or desirable. If only aligned memory accesses are naturally atomic on a given architecture, misaligned objects of the same type have to use locks.. 19.04.2017 · the goal is to allow libc++ to implement`atomic__lock_free` on windows using clang.
Devsnek changed the title __atomic_is_lock_free undefined __atomic_is_lock_free undefined on clang on jun 18, 2019. 19.04.2017 · the goal is to allow libc++ to implement`atomic__lock_free` on windows using clang. 26.07.2017 · well clang gives error: Which, combined with the builtin returning int, results in a call having the wrong type. So w/e msvc's stl does it's likely not sane or desirable. Targos added a commit that referenced this issue on … Devsnek closed this in ab3174c on jun 21, 2019.

Junaruga changed the title rake failed with undefined reference to `__atomic_is_lock_free' install failed with undefined reference to …. Devsnek changed the title __atomic_is_lock_free undefined __atomic_is_lock_free undefined on clang on jun 18, 2019. Symbol(s) not found for architecture x86_64 clang: 15.05.2017 · no, i'm not able help debug or i don't have time to help. Devsnek closed this in ab3174c on jun 21, 2019. Also afaik msvc leaves the implementation of atomics up to the library, not the frontend. Targos added a commit that referenced this issue on … 19.04.2017 · the goal is to allow libc++ to implement`atomic__lock_free` on windows using clang. Junaruga changed the title rake failed with undefined reference to `__atomic_is_lock_free' install failed with undefined reference to … Devsnek closed this in ab3174c on jun 21, 2019.
15.05.2017 · no, i'm not able help debug or i don't have time to help. Junaruga changed the title rake failed with undefined reference to `__atomic_is_lock_free' install failed with undefined reference to … #define atomic_is_lock_free (obj) __c11_atomic_is_lock_free (sizeof (* (obj))). Devsnek changed the title __atomic_is_lock_free undefined __atomic_is_lock_free undefined on clang on jun 18, 2019. So w/e msvc's stl does it's likely not sane or desirable. 19.04.2017 · the goal is to allow libc++ to implement`atomic__lock_free` on windows using clang... Devsnek closed this in ab3174c on jun 21, 2019.
/pic2825851.jpg)
Also afaik msvc leaves the implementation of atomics up to the library, not the frontend... 26.07.2017 · well clang gives error: 15.05.2017 · no, i'm not able help debug or i don't have time to help. Undefined symbols for architecture x86_64: #define atomic_is_lock_free (obj) __c11_atomic_is_lock_free (sizeof (* (obj)))... The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
#define atomic_is_lock_free (obj) __c11_atomic_is_lock_free (sizeof (* (obj))). Which, combined with the builtin returning int, results in a call having the wrong type. As you know libc++ currently uses the __gcc_atomic_foo macros, but those aren't available on windows. 19.04.2017 · the goal is to allow libc++ to implement`atomic__lock_free` on windows using clang. Symbol(s) not found for architecture x86_64 clang: Devsnek closed this in ab3174c on jun 21, 2019. #define atomic_is_lock_free (obj) __c11_atomic_is_lock_free (sizeof (* (obj))). Also afaik msvc leaves the implementation of atomics up to the library, not the frontend. If only aligned memory accesses are naturally atomic on a given architecture, misaligned objects of the same type have to use locks... Undefined symbols for architecture x86_64:
So w/e msvc's stl does it's likely not sane or desirable... Devsnek changed the title __atomic_is_lock_free undefined __atomic_is_lock_free undefined on clang on jun 18, 2019. The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: #define atomic_is_lock_free (obj) __c11_atomic_is_lock_free (sizeof (* (obj))). Undefined symbols for architecture x86_64: 26.07.2017 · well clang gives error: 15.05.2017 · no, i'm not able help debug or i don't have time to help. So w/e msvc's stl does it's likely not sane or desirable. Devsnek closed this in ab3174c on jun 21, 2019.. Devsnek closed this in ab3174c on jun 21, 2019.

Symbol(s) not found for architecture x86_64 clang:.. Devsnek changed the title __atomic_is_lock_free undefined __atomic_is_lock_free undefined on clang on jun 18, 2019. 19.04.2017 · the goal is to allow libc++ to implement`atomic__lock_free` on windows using clang. So w/e msvc's stl does it's likely not sane or desirable... #define atomic_is_lock_free (obj) __c11_atomic_is_lock_free (sizeof (* (obj))).

Devsnek closed this in ab3174c on jun 21, 2019.. . As you know libc++ currently uses the __gcc_atomic_foo macros, but those aren't available on windows.

If only aligned memory accesses are naturally atomic on a given architecture, misaligned objects of the same type have to use locks. Also afaik msvc leaves the implementation of atomics up to the library, not the frontend. As you know libc++ currently uses the __gcc_atomic_foo macros, but those aren't available on windows. Devsnek changed the title __atomic_is_lock_free undefined __atomic_is_lock_free undefined on clang on jun 18, 2019. Devsnek closed this in ab3174c on jun 21, 2019.. Symbol(s) not found for architecture x86_64 clang:

Devsnek changed the title __atomic_is_lock_free undefined __atomic_is_lock_free undefined on clang on jun 18, 2019. Junaruga changed the title rake failed with undefined reference to `__atomic_is_lock_free' install failed with undefined reference to … Undefined symbols for architecture x86_64: Which, combined with the builtin returning int, results in a call having the wrong type... The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:

Also afaik msvc leaves the implementation of atomics up to the library, not the frontend. Devsnek closed this in ab3174c on jun 21, 2019. So w/e msvc's stl does it's likely not sane or desirable. Targos added a commit that referenced this issue on … If only aligned memory accesses are naturally atomic on a given architecture, misaligned objects of the same type have to use locks. As you know libc++ currently uses the __gcc_atomic_foo macros, but those aren't available on windows. #define atomic_is_lock_free (obj) __c11_atomic_is_lock_free (sizeof (* (obj))). 26.07.2017 · well clang gives error: Devsnek changed the title __atomic_is_lock_free undefined __atomic_is_lock_free undefined on clang on jun 18, 2019. Junaruga changed the title rake failed with undefined reference to `__atomic_is_lock_free' install failed with undefined reference to … Also afaik msvc leaves the implementation of atomics up to the library, not the frontend.. #define atomic_is_lock_free (obj) __c11_atomic_is_lock_free (sizeof (* (obj))).

The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: Targos added a commit that referenced this issue on … Junaruga changed the title rake failed with undefined reference to `__atomic_is_lock_free' install failed with undefined reference to … Devsnek closed this in ab3174c on jun 21, 2019. 15.05.2017 · no, i'm not able help debug or i don't have time to help. Symbol(s) not found for architecture x86_64 clang: 26.07.2017 · well clang gives error: Undefined symbols for architecture x86_64:
Devsnek closed this in ab3174c on jun 21, 2019. #define atomic_is_lock_free (obj) __c11_atomic_is_lock_free (sizeof (* (obj))). So w/e msvc's stl does it's likely not sane or desirable. Also afaik msvc leaves the implementation of atomics up to the library, not the frontend. 26.07.2017 · well clang gives error: Junaruga changed the title rake failed with undefined reference to `__atomic_is_lock_free' install failed with undefined reference to … 19.04.2017 · the goal is to allow libc++ to implement`atomic__lock_free` on windows using clang... Devsnek changed the title __atomic_is_lock_free undefined __atomic_is_lock_free undefined on clang on jun 18, 2019.

15.05.2017 · no, i'm not able help debug or i don't have time to help. Also afaik msvc leaves the implementation of atomics up to the library, not the frontend. As you know libc++ currently uses the __gcc_atomic_foo macros, but those aren't available on windows. The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: 26.07.2017 · well clang gives error: Symbol(s) not found for architecture x86_64 clang: 19.04.2017 · the goal is to allow libc++ to implement`atomic__lock_free` on windows using clang. Devsnek closed this in ab3174c on jun 21, 2019. #define atomic_is_lock_free (obj) __c11_atomic_is_lock_free (sizeof (* (obj))). Devsnek changed the title __atomic_is_lock_free undefined __atomic_is_lock_free undefined on clang on jun 18, 2019. So w/e msvc's stl does it's likely not sane or desirable.

Devsnek closed this in ab3174c on jun 21, 2019.. As you know libc++ currently uses the __gcc_atomic_foo macros, but those aren't available on windows. #define atomic_is_lock_free (obj) __c11_atomic_is_lock_free (sizeof (* (obj))). The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: Undefined symbols for architecture x86_64: Also afaik msvc leaves the implementation of atomics up to the library, not the frontend. 19.04.2017 · the goal is to allow libc++ to implement`atomic__lock_free` on windows using clang. 15.05.2017 · no, i'm not able help debug or i don't have time to help. Symbol(s) not found for architecture x86_64 clang: Also afaik msvc leaves the implementation of atomics up to the library, not the frontend.

Also afaik msvc leaves the implementation of atomics up to the library, not the frontend. So w/e msvc's stl does it's likely not sane or desirable. Undefined symbols for architecture x86_64: #define atomic_is_lock_free (obj) __c11_atomic_is_lock_free (sizeof (* (obj))). Also afaik msvc leaves the implementation of atomics up to the library, not the frontend. Devsnek changed the title __atomic_is_lock_free undefined __atomic_is_lock_free undefined on clang on jun 18, 2019.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: So w/e msvc's stl does it's likely not sane or desirable. Which, combined with the builtin returning int, results in a call having the wrong type.. Devsnek closed this in ab3174c on jun 21, 2019.

Which, combined with the builtin returning int, results in a call having the wrong type.. 26.07.2017 · well clang gives error: 15.05.2017 · no, i'm not able help debug or i don't have time to help. Devsnek changed the title __atomic_is_lock_free undefined __atomic_is_lock_free undefined on clang on jun 18, 2019.
